Arthur Fuller
artful at rogers.com
Sun Oct 5 21:56:05 CDT 2003
Well, no. I object. I trust intelligent subjects and ignore the contents of messages that are not of immediate interest. Call me a fascist if you want, but I think your way of going about it is incorrect, and until browbeaten into submission, I will not cooperate with your misguided intention. Subjects are subjects; contents are details. I think I did it correctly and if you missed the point, I don't think that's my problem. Arthur -----Original Message----- From: dba-sqlserver-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-sqlserver-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Stuart McLachlan Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 3:43 PM To: dba-sqlserver at databaseadvisors.com Subject: Re: [dba-SQLServer]Question about Computed Columns On 5 Oct 2003 at 15:25, Stephen Hait wrote: > Computed columns, maybe? > > > When what was introduced to SQL > > That's the trouble with relying on the subject to contain part of your message. I (plus, I suspect, many others - including Paul) just flick through their list messages without even looking at the Subject header. It's actually quite annoying to have to look up at the subject to get the sense of the message when you are skipping through them. Could I ask nicely that people put all the relevant content in the body? Please? -- Lexacorp Ltd http://www.lexacorp.com.pg Information Technology Consultancy, Software Development,System Support. _______________________________________________ dba-SQLServer mailing list dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver http://www.databaseadvisors.com --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.516 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.516 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003