Francisco Tapia
fhtapia at gmail.com
Thu Jul 13 03:20:40 CDT 2006
generally you do not install 2000 on a 2005 server, it just isn't done (in general). I've seen servers work well w/ as an example 7.0 and 2000 instances. but when you upgrade you loose the old EM and are now forced to use the new EM for 2000 in that situation, for 2005 I beleive it's similar, the install will remove EM and put in Visual Studio manager (or whatever it's called). -- Francisco On 7/12/06, Jim Lawrence <accessd at shaw.ca> wrote: > > Hi All: > > Installing MSSQL 2003 on a server already hosting MSSQL 2000 is a simple > task. The installation routines asks how you wish to name the new SQL 2003 > install so it does not conflict with the present MSSQL. > > I have not tried to install MSSQL 2000 on a box already hosting MSSQL 2003 > and was wondering if anyone has done this process and if there are any > issues to manage. > > MTIA > Jim > > _______________________________________________ > dba-SQLServer mailing list > dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver > http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > -- -Francisco http://pcthis.blogspot.com |PC news with out the jargon! http://sqlthis.blogspot.com | Tsql and More...