[dba-SQLServer] [AccessD] MySQL

Mark Breen marklbreen at gmail.com
Sun Sep 18 10:24:09 CDT 2011


Hello Jim / Arthur

Thanks for that analysis, quite accurate.

Mr Colby, just a question, why are you not advising your client to use the
free MS SQL express R2.  I use it all the time and PowerDNN use it on all
there servers that host 100,000 DNN installations.  All free db's.  That is
not to be sniffed it.  And there are loads of tools to help with the
enterprise tools that Express does not ship with.  (Note:  the free version
does give you SSMS)

Mark


On 18 September 2011 07:01, Jim Lawrence <accessd at shaw.ca> wrote:

> Postgesql and Postgres Plus are the heirs apparent. They can now do what
> MySQL will ever be allowed to do and that is become an enterprise database.
> Oracle has no intention of building a free competitor.
>
> Read more: http://www.postgresql.org/,
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PostgreSQL and
>
> http://www.enterprisedb.com/products-services-training/products/postgres-plu
> s-advanced-server
>
> There are lots of documents and samples and the product is very stable.
> There has been a lot of excitement with the latest versions.
>
> Jim
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dba-sqlserver-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:dba-sqlserver-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Arthur
> Fuller
> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 6:53 PM
> To: Discussion concerning MS SQL Server
> Subject: Re: [dba-SQLServer] [AccessD] MySQL
>
> There are some nice things about MySQL but on the other hand I definitely
> do
> not like where Oracle is going with this puppy since its acquisition of Sun
> and by inheritance MySQL. I'm still on the fence about these developments,
> but quite frankly I am leaning against Oracle on all these transmutations
> of
> what was originally a simple, straightforward approach. At last
> recollection, Monty has departed, and with him, I fear, has the guiding
> vision of this product.
>
> Frankly, I am all over the place on where next to go: I look at Mongo and
> see it exquisite for web-apps but not for OLTP situations. I look at
> PostGreSQL and think it's got a bunch of things right. I look at Oracle and
> MS-SQL and think they have some things right as well. I frankly do not have
> any clue into which basket to toss my next eggs.
>
> Arthur
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Stuart McLachlan
> <stuart at lexacorp.com.pg>wrote:
>
> > I run MySQL locally as part of a WAMP installation and remotely on our
> > FreeBSD servers.
> >
> > I use phpMyAdmin for all the administration.   It's a very intuitive
> > interface.
> >
> > It's possibly worth installing WAMP just for the phpMyAdmin.
> >
> > --
> > Stuart
> >
> >
> > On 17 Sep 2011 at 19:24, jwcolby wrote:
> >
> > > For now I have to figure out how to create a database.  Is it the same
> > > concept as SQL Server?  A file or set of files where tables, indexes,
> > > views etc are stored?  I assumed there would be some visual designer
> > > that would allow me to create the db, then tables etc.  It looks like
> > > that stuff is in "SQL Development".
> > >
> > > This thing looks pretty nice, but very different on the surface.
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dba-SQLServer mailing list
> > dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com
> > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver
> > http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> dba-SQLServer mailing list
> dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver
> http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> dba-SQLServer mailing list
> dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver
> http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
>



More information about the dba-SQLServer mailing list