[dba-SQLServer] Genealogy of Relational Databases

It was more "relational" than dBase which is in there ;-)

On 19 Sep 2012 at 19:21, Arthur Fuller wrote:

> It's been at least a decade since I used it. I can't remember if it
> qualifies as an RDBMS. In its day it was powerful, so I don't think it was
> oversight that explains its absence. Don't mean to start a war over the
> definition of RDBMS.
> 
> A.
> 
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Stuart McLachlan <stuart at lexacorp.com.pg>wrote:
> 
> > Where's Dataflex?
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> dba-SQLServer mailing list
> dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver
> http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 
>