Drew Wutka
dbatech at wolfwares.com
Fri Aug 22 17:05:09 CDT 2003
Oh yes....agreed. Thought you meant all 255 addresses, not just the 0 and 255 ones. Drew ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stuart McLachlan" <stuart at lexacorp.com.pg> To: "Discussion of Hardware and Software issues" <dba-tech at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 5:01 PM Subject: RE: [dba-Tech] Modems > On 22 Aug 2003 at 7:49, Foote, Chris wrote: > > > One minor correction Drew. > > > > If Steven's IP addresses are from the 192.168.0.x block with a subnet mask > > of 255.255.255.0, 192.168.0.0 to 255 may well not be useable as this is > > subnet zero. The lowest block of addresses will be 192.168.1.1 to > > 192.168.1.254 > > > Still doesn't make sense. > > 192.168.0.0 and 192.168.0.255 shouldn't be used, but 192.158.0.1 to > 192.168.0.254 are fine. > > > > > > -- > Lexacorp Ltd > http://www.lexacorp.com.pg > Information Technology Consultancy, Software Development,System > Support. > > > > _______________________________________________ > dba-Tech mailing list > dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >