Gustav Brock
Gustav at cactus.dk
Tue Jan 4 04:56:58 CST 2005
Hi Mark The major advantage is that SATA is two-way while ATA is one-way, either read or write. That's why ATA is no-no for heavy loaded servers while SATA is useful (low price) though still not as fast as SCSI. /gustav >>> Mark.Mitsules at ngc.com 03-01-2005 19:38:46 >>> SATA does give a "theoretical" boost in two ways. First is the current SATA/150 spec vs. the P-ATA/133 spec. Second is the dedicated channel vs. a possible conflict with a second IDE device in the typical master/slave setup. But, having noticed a considerable improvement in performance when I moved to a drive with a 8MB cache when they first came out, I can't wait to see the performance gains in both my new Raptor (10k rpm) and my new Maxtor (16MB cache). Mark -----Original Message----- From: jmoss111 at bellsouth.net [mailto:jmoss111 at bellsouth.net] Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 1:25 PM To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues Subject: Re: RE: [dba-Tech] Software Firewalls >From what I've read and tests that I've seen, SATA in itself doesn't really give a performance improvement. The improvement in SATA come from the 10,000 RPM drives used currently only on the WD Raptors (37Gb and 74 Gb) AFAIK. SATA 2 may be a different story, but I haven't seen any SATA2 drives on the market or SATA2 tests yet.