Steve Erbach
erbachs at gmail.com
Fri May 6 07:40:57 CDT 2005
John, Well, I don't really want to get rid of IE. It's just that this behavior was goofy enough that I'd considered uninstalling and reinstalling until I figured out that it might be a pirated copy. Here's a completely different question: Do you have any feel for the level of acceptance of the Microsoft enhancements to Cascading Style Sheets? I haven't exactly been like a kid in a candy store, but they're fun to play with. For example, I've modified a web page header for a client's web site using two different MS Filters: http://www.bxwi.com/builders_exchange_of_wisconsin.htm http://www.bxwi.com/bxwiwithlights.htm These two examples use RandomDissolve and Light filters. Of course they only work with IE. Since my client's web site specifically requires IE, I didn't worry about cross-platform stuff when I worked up these samples for a new service (the logo was designed by Janet, by the way). Steve Erbach On 5/5/05, John Bartow <john at winhaven.net> wrote: > Isn't that part of MS's court argument that IE is integral with Windows? > ;o) > > Yes, it is normal. You have to do some serious hacking to get rid of IE. I > believe if you do you are somewhat limited in much of your capabilities due > to a whole slew of program relying on it being there. I kind of gave up > following that whole line of thought during the big debate because I deal > with too many small clients to ever think that I could actually replace IE > in any great amount. I think I have one client using Firefox and that's > mostly because of his college intern.