Steve Erbach
erbachs at gmail.com
Sat Jul 7 19:45:36 CDT 2007
John, » Trying to do that as a business is tough. If people pay $500 for a machine, they cannot understand how you can charge them $60 / hour for 5 hours to run down some devilish problem. » And that is why I became a programmer. Not enough of them, more demand than supply, and yet still that fascinating "solving a puzzle" environment. « For a few months two years ago or so I put out the word that I'd clean up systems for a low fee ($50). It was pin money, more or less. Now that I've gotten into the full-time working world again (13 months, now) I've done very little of this sort of thing. This particular case is one where a friend asked me to help her daughter out. If the types of problems were more predictable it would be a bit more enjoyable. But having to research something new every stinking time has gotten old. I like what I'm doing in my current job, and weekly pay is awfully nice. 15 years of my own business was about 5 years too long. I was stupidly stubborn about seeking full-time employment. Steve Erbach On 7/7/07, jwcolby <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com> wrote: > Steve, > > Back in the 80s I fixed stuff - back then down to the chip level with > schematics, o'scopes and soldering irons. It was interesting but not a > particularly high paying job. Today it is more "swap boards" and VERY low > paying. Troubleshooting software problems is much more complex though just > because of the shear complexity of the various pieces and their > interactions. Trying to do that as a business is tough. If people pay $500 > for a machine, they cannot understand how you can charge them $60 / hour for > 5 hours to run down some devilish problem. > > And that is why I became a programmer. Not enough of them, more demand than > supply, and yet still that fascinating "solving a puzzle" environment. > > John W. Colby > Colby Consulting > www.ColbyConsulting.com