Jim Lawrence
accessd at shaw.ca
Wed Mar 12 12:15:33 CDT 2008
Gustav; you are right in that I should have made a backup/snap-shot/ISO before attempting to install... just getting careless but as a regular supply of updates arrive from MS and I have had no ill effects, for years. I just became a little complacent. It will be a while before I make that mistake again. ...But I made the decision to add a new server to the mix. The hardware should be box with capacity for 8GB and have a couple of half tera-byte drives. May only install 4GB now and 4 later. I have a new copy of MS Server enterprise 64 bit 2008 as well of SQL 2008 and hope to install them along with the new MS virtual servers. My plan is to make the base server as plain as possible and place all the functionality in the Virtual servers. According to MS, the new virtual servers only loss between 2 and 4 percent in performance in comparison with 15% for the older versions. There is also a snap-shot feature installed which parallels VMware's functionality. It should be ready by the weekend. So we will see... keep you posted. ...any insights? Jim -----Original Message----- From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gustav Brock Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 12:36 AM To: dba-tech at databaseadvisors.com Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Update on WHS corruption bug Hi Jim This is an example where it could have been an advantage to run it in a VMware virtual server, as this can take a snapshot of the complete installation before you apply anything new - patches, updates, new install, config changes etc. /gustav >>> accessd at shaw.ca 12-03-2008 04:03 >>> Hi John: Good for you John. Sometime these guys at MS get just too cocky. I am embroiled in a problem with my IIS server. After downloading and installing the latest Server2003 File System Objects package, my IIS stopped supporting ASP Two weeks later ASP still did not work so finally I phoned MS. After a numbers of visits, about 5 hours logged, two senior techs have ran out of solutions, on the incident and a third fellow will be phoning tomorrow. So far ASP will now display a web site but can not connect to a SQL server yet. There is a third piece to the puzzle that the ASP mail no longer works but as it was only just discovered they will not allow it as part of the single incident. Considering the problem was cause by one of their products it seems that I am paying for their mistake. The last time I phoned for help with product (1998-1999) from MS was when an IE version crashed (timed out in download... as their servers were over taxed) half way through an install. I had to re-install the server to fix that one. It was on my main NT server and again the incident was caused by one of their applications. Now I fell better. Well you should have everything running by June... race you. Jim _______________________________________________ dba-Tech mailing list dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com