Bobby Heid
bheid at sc.rr.com
Thu Nov 13 16:14:15 CST 2008
I agree that faster RPMs generally mean faster access. In my experience, the 5400 RPM drives are slower (usually in laptops) compared to a comparable 7200 RMP drive (in most desktops). I am in the process of gathering the parts for a new build and I just got the WD Velociraptor 10,000 RPM drive because it is considered one of the fastest non-SCSI drives out there. Bobby -----Original Message----- From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gary Kjos Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 11:28 AM To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] What's Better? I've found that for Access work in particular rotation speed makes a big difference. As you say there are other factors such as buffering that factor into it too, but in most cases the faster rotation will translate to faster transfer rate and faster seek times. As files get fragmented the faster seek time will really make a difference. In my opinion. I had a 10,000 rpm SCSI drive in one of my older systems - until it croaked - and that baby screamed when doing Access work. I really miss that. GK