Janet Erbach
jerbach at gmail.com
Tue Feb 9 12:33:54 CST 2010
Thanks, Jim. There IS a resolution, you know, but I'm saving the kerosene and the match for our evil IBM copier... On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Jim Lawrence <accessd at shaw.ca> wrote: > Hi Janet: > > A friend who is working on a very similar site, SBS 2008, ran with most of > the defaults when he did the install and even with a full RAID, it still > runs like a dog. My job on this install was to redesign and deploy a new > version of their POS and Estimator application (which I am still working > on...). I have been moving as much of the FE application to the desktop as > possible and migrating the BE to the MS SQL and performance has improved > but > it is still not stellar. > > A client of mine, of which I did the install, has a stand-alone 2008 > server, > with many of the SBS applications installed... MS SQL server 2005, IIS, MS > Exchange (really needs its own server), Active directory, etc... But I use > a > hardware firewall and have 8 GB of RAM. The box probably runs at least > twice > as fast considering the hardware is probably physically slower than the new > SBS box. > > Sorry, to say that and then be of no help to improve your performance but > as > far as I know there may not be any resolution... but if I hear of some > tweaks or fixes you will be immediately informed through a post here. > > Jim > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Janet Erbach > Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 8:47 AM > To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues > Subject: [dba-Tech] SBS 2008 Performance Issues > > I started a thread about a month ago in relation to extremely high > virtual/physical memory usage on our SBS 2008 server. It looks like the > issue may be a two-fold one: > > 1) We customized our installation of SBS 2008 and did NOT turn on the > Microsoft Exchange features. We didn't want them. And it's starting to > look like... > > 2) Having Exchange turned off has adversely affected the SBS Monitoring > Services. SBS Monitoring has not cleaned up after itself properly since it > was first installed, and I've found a couple of troubleshooting references > that mention making sure two specific Exchange services are running. So > I'm > wondering if Monitoring can't clean up after itself without Exchange > running > in the background...The Monitoring database has reached it's built-in 4 gb > limit, and it generates dozens of errors all day long because of that. > > I think that SBS Monitoring is thrashing constantly to try and do what it's > supposed to do - and can't, due to database overgrowth. Does anyone know > how I can go about turning off SBS monitoring completely? Stopping the > services isn't enough...that has had no effect on memory usage. I can't > find any helpful info on the issue through my web searches. And, unlike > SBS 2003, you can't just uninstall SBS Monitoring - it does not appear as a > seperate entity in the add/remove programs list. > > Or...am I better off starting over and re-installing SBS 2008 from scratch > using the default settings so that it SBS 2008 will behave itself? > > Janet Erbach > _______________________________________________ > dba-Tech mailing list > dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > _______________________________________________ > dba-Tech mailing list > dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >