Jim Lawrence
accessd at shaw.ca
Tue Mar 30 15:50:17 CDT 2010
Hi Janet: A system does not need a full image backup continuously. I traditionally use an image backup to set a 'Tomb Stone' and then just have the backups app doing a regular backup. In the event of a major set of updates of system configuration then an image can be redone. If a full restore is ever required then the image backup is first used to rebuild a fully bootable drive and the regular backs are use to restore the current status. There is something that seems to not be common knowledge: First; a fully bootable image of a drive can not be created while a system is running. The system must be stopped then booted from a DVD/Memory stick with your favourite Image backup application on it and then the full image can be created. Second; products that claim they can do a full image while the system is running are not telling the whole truth. There is only one way they can even start a backup and that is by either having exclusive use of the drives, not practical on an operation server or do a Shadow backup. Neither of those methods are complete on an operational drive. Third; a Shadow backup is a backup created from the system's duplication method. Those duplicated file tend to be sporadic especially on a very active server and image does not end up with any of the primary drive info or boot track information as it can not be duplicated while the system is running...also having Shadow Copy feature running on an OS drive sucks up recourses like crazy. For those and other reasons Shadow Copies should never be used on the boot drive...only on data drives. HTH Jim -----Original Message----- From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Janet Erbach Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 9:28 AM To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Symantec Backup Exec Jim - Like you, we've been backing up to a portable device and taking the disks off-site using Casper. But I was told last week that Casper does not provide a truly bootable image for SBS 2008. I guess I balk at the standard Windows backup from an ease of recoverability standpoint in a total server crash. I like the idea of backups that provide a bootable image that can be restored onto another machine without having to re-install every bit of software. I've never been in that kind of dead-in-the-water situation (thankfully!) so I'm just going by what I imagine the recovery process to be like. Which, of course, is very likely way off the mark. Am I putting too much emphasis on the importance of a bootable image? Thanks for the info on logmein - I will look into that more. On your client's SBS 2008 machine...do you happen to know what the base line day-to-day memory usage is? Ours is running at around 12gb out of 16 total...and I'm starting to think that 2008 is such a resource pig that it really does require that much. I would be curious to know if your client's machine runs like that as well. Janet