Janet Erbach
jerbach at gmail.com
Tue Mar 30 16:20:27 CDT 2010
Wow! I did not know that about bootable backups. (Not that I know that much about backups to begin with...) Thank you for that...I will continue to research other backup options then! Janet On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jim Lawrence <accessd at shaw.ca> wrote: > Hi Janet: > > A system does not need a full image backup continuously. I traditionally > use > an image backup to set a 'Tomb Stone' and then just have the backups app > doing a regular backup. In the event of a major set of updates of system > configuration then an image can be redone. If a full restore is ever > required then the image backup is first used to rebuild a fully bootable > drive and the regular backs are use to restore the current status. > > There is something that seems to not be common knowledge: > > First; a fully bootable image of a drive can not be created while a system > is running. The system must be stopped then booted from a DVD/Memory stick > with your favourite Image backup application on it and then the full image > can be created. > > Second; products that claim they can do a full image while the system is > running are not telling the whole truth. There is only one way they can > even > start a backup and that is by either having exclusive use of the drives, > not > practical on an operation server or do a Shadow backup. Neither of those > methods are complete on an operational drive. > > Third; a Shadow backup is a backup created from the system's duplication > method. Those duplicated file tend to be sporadic especially on a very > active server and image does not end up with any of the primary drive info > or boot track information as it can not be duplicated while the system is > running...also having Shadow Copy feature running on an OS drive sucks up > recourses like crazy. For those and other reasons Shadow Copies should > never > be used on the boot drive...only on data drives. > > HTH > Jim > > > -----Original Message----- > From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Janet Erbach > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 9:28 AM > To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues > Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Symantec Backup Exec > > Jim - > > Like you, we've been backing up to a portable device and taking the disks > off-site using Casper. But I was told last week that Casper does not > provide a truly bootable image for SBS 2008. > > I guess I balk at the standard Windows backup from an ease of > recoverability > standpoint in a total server crash. I like the idea of backups that > provide > a bootable image that can be restored onto another machine without having > to > re-install every bit of software. I've never been in that kind of > dead-in-the-water situation (thankfully!) so I'm just going by what I > imagine the recovery process to be like. Which, of course, is very likely > way off the mark. Am I putting too much emphasis on the importance of a > bootable image? > > Thanks for the info on logmein - I will look into that more. > > On your client's SBS 2008 machine...do you happen to know what the base > line > day-to-day memory usage is? Ours is running at around 12gb out of 16 > total...and I'm starting to think that 2008 is such a resource pig that it > really does require that much. I would be curious to know if your client's > machine runs like that as well. > > Janet > > _______________________________________________ > dba-Tech mailing list > dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >