[dba-Tech] Now why is not Windows written to this standard?

You mean MSNet don't you? ;-)

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Mike Mattys
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 10:16 PM
To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues
Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Now why is not Windows written to this standard?



Oh, you're talking about SkyNet, huh?

Michael R Mattys
Business Process Developers
www.mattysconsulting.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Lawrence" <accessd at shaw.ca>
To: "'Discussion of Hardware and Software issues'" 
<dba-tech at databaseadvisors.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 10:07 PM
Subject: [dba-Tech] Now why is not Windows written to this standard?


>I received this link and it made me ask the question...Why can not Windows
> be written with the same confidence? Does Windows and virtually all other
> software for that matter have to have thousands of errors? Is it because
> thousands of jobs depend on those errors?
>
> if MS could even come close to matching a near perfect Desktop, would they
> have any concerns from competition? Is there not checking software that if
> given time and the right testing scenarios can virtually uncover any bug?
> But what do I know?
>
> http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/06/writestuff.html?page=0,0
>
> Jim
>
> _______________________________________________
> dba-Tech mailing list
> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 


_______________________________________________
dba-Tech mailing list
dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com