Jason Strickland
jason at purplecone.com
Thu Sep 15 07:12:31 CDT 2011
We use the vSphere free versions on our campus. We currently have the 3.5, 4.1 & now 5.0 installed on 6 physical servers. On each of those servers we are running 5 virtual servers with them being Windows 2003, Windows 2008 & Fedora. As long as the server is within the last 3-4 years, vSphere will work very good. On our oldest server, it is a little slower than the newer boxes when you have extensive CPU usage (such as Windows Updates). We use HP servers so we have a USB drive on the inside that we boot from instead of using the physical drives. On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Gustav Brock <Gustav at cactus.dk> wrote: > Hi Mark > > What is "VMWare vSphere free version"? > We use the free VMware Server extensively, it even runs the two DCs. > > At workstations with Win7, we use the free XP Mode for running old apps. It > works very well too. > > /gustav > > > >>> marklbreen at gmail.com 15-09-2011 11:40 >>> > Hello All, > > I was reading about the VMWare vSphere free version this morning. If VM > are > market leaders, and this product is free, is it any good? > > I appears to be able to do a bare metal installation and may even allow > some > form of dynamic ram usage, so you can configure 4 VM with 4 GB each, and > still load all four in a machine with 12 GB (approx) of physical ram. > > Is that the way to go? > > I did you Win 8 HyperV before, but I have to assume a light weight bare > metal VM software is a better option ? > > thanks > Mark > > > _______________________________________________ > dba-Tech mailing list > dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > -- "One reason a dog has so many friends: he wags his tail instead of his tongue."