[dba-Tech] Ai and Robotix

While Wikipedia is a Igood initial source of information and links on the basics of 
non-controversial subjects, it is severely polluted by "gatekeepers" on any subject over which 
there is a degree of controversy.

Wikipedia can never be a "trusted" source.  

-- 
Stuart

On 9 Apr 2012 at 21:53, Jim Lawrence wrote:

> I was quoting but the truth is if you see something that is obviously wrong
> you can fix it. In theory, this means that the end results are more
> accurate.
> 
> Wikipedia is probably the largest encyclopedia ever created covering more
> subjects and more people than any single source in history and it has the
> largest group of experts ever assembled that monitor the input.
> 
> If there are some issues with it, that are blatantly wrong, get busy...after
> all eventually this may, eventually, be our single source of "trusted"
> information. ;-)
> 
> Jim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Stuart McLachlan
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 2:26 PM
> To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues
> Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Ai and Robotix
> 
> "deeper, more accurate"? 
> 
> ROTFLMAO
> 
> On 9 Apr 2012 at 8:43, Jim Lawrence wrote:
> 
> > the advent of Wikipedia proved that crowd-sourced knowledge curation
> > provided broader, deeper, and more accurate results than the traditional
> > small pool of experts..."
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dba-Tech mailing list
> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dba-Tech mailing list
> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>