Jim Lawrence
accessd at shaw.ca
Tue Apr 10 01:10:32 CDT 2012
That is as it should be. Wikipedia should be topical but it is not just an opinion magazine of current events and editorials or a soap box for wing-nuts and radicals. ;-) Jim -----Original Message----- From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Stuart McLachlan Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 10:19 PM To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Ai and Robotix While Wikipedia is a Igood initial source of information and links on the basics of non-controversial subjects, it is severely polluted by "gatekeepers" on any subject over which there is a degree of controversy. Wikipedia can never be a "trusted" source. -- Stuart On 9 Apr 2012 at 21:53, Jim Lawrence wrote: > I was quoting but the truth is if you see something that is obviously wrong > you can fix it. In theory, this means that the end results are more > accurate. > > Wikipedia is probably the largest encyclopedia ever created covering more > subjects and more people than any single source in history and it has the > largest group of experts ever assembled that monitor the input. > > If there are some issues with it, that are blatantly wrong, get busy...after > all eventually this may, eventually, be our single source of "trusted" > information. ;-) > > Jim