[dba-Tech] http://dromaeo.com/?jslib etc. - IE10 and Chrome 24 javascript testw results

Hans-Christian Andersen hans.andersen at phulse.com
Sat Feb 2 19:03:31 CST 2013


Ah, got it. Thanks. Looks like the numbers are bit less conclusive. One thing for certain is that IE 10 is a vast improvement over IE 9.

- Hans


On 2013-02-02, at 2:57 PM, Salakhetdinov Shamil <mcp2004 at mail.ru> wrote:

> + testings => http://www.speed-battle.com/
> 
> IE10, Win8 Prof 64bit
> Calculate: 27.68
> Store: 461.52
> Render: 8.26
> Overall Score: 497.46
> 
> Chrome 24, Win8 Prof 64bit
> Calculate: 75.85
> Store: 268.59
> Render: 5.6
> Overall Score: 350.04 -- Shamil
> 
> 
> Воскресенье,  3 февраля 2013, 2:36 +04:00 от Salakhetdinov Shamil <mcp2004 at mail.ru>:
>> Hi Hans --
>> 
>> I have just run   http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/ .
>> Here are the results:
>> 
>> Chrome 24, VM Win7 Ultimate 32bit:          => 2739 - HTML5 Capabilities 6/7
>> Chrome 24, VM Win7 64bit Prof:                 => 2858 - HTML5 Capabilities 5/7
>> Chrome 24, "bare metal" Win8 Prof 64bit:  => 3152 - HTML5 Capabilities 6/7
>> http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/results?key=6ctT
>> 
>> IE9, VM Win7 Ultimate 32bit:                      => 1139 - HTML5 Capabilities 3/7
>> IE9, VM Win7 64bit Prof:                             => 1220 - HTML5 Capabilities 3/7
>> IE10, "bare metal" Win8 Prof 64bit:            => 1798 - HTML5 Capabilities 3/7
>> http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/results?key=6ctc&resultId=2963468 I haven't had IE10 for Win7 tests.
>> 
>> As it happens Chrome outperforms IE10 and has almost complete HTML5 capabilities.
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> -- Shamil
>> 
>> 
>> Суббота,  2 февраля 2013, 11:01 -08:00 от Hans-Christian Andersen < hans.andersen at phulse.com >:
>>> 
>>>> I don't care that much how impartial the tests are - after all they made for Mozilla and I've tested IE and Chrome - may I assume the tests are impartial? I suppose I may....
>>>> 
>>>> And it doesn't matter for me that IE 10 runs better than Chrome 24 (or Safari)  or not - AFAIS IE 10 is not bad at all for everyday tasks - am I missing something?
>>> 
>>> It matters because many browsers are implemented differently, but they are all trying to work well enough with the same standard. If a test is designed to work best with your browser (and another one happens to work ok with, but not all of them), then you are testing a non-standard feature. The only thing that has been proven is that Internet Explorer 10 is more compatible with Mozilla Firefox, if you catch my drift. :)
>>> 
>>>> Out of just sport interests I'd be curious to run really impartial Javascript tests on IE10 and compare them with Chrome and Safari - what such tests could be IYO?
>>> 
>>> These days, performance is pretty decent across all browsers, so it really doesn't matter at all. The only ones who care are the companies/teams behind the browsers, so when searching for any decent javascript benchmarking sites, you will come across one from microsoft, one from mozilla, one from google, etc.
>>> 
>>> If you want an impartial test, I might suggest this one:
>>> http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/
>>> 
>>> Futuremark is a company which builds benchmarking software (originally for 3D graphics cards). I would trust them a lot more than I would trust a benchmark from any of the above companies.
>>> 
>>> Another one is:  http://www.speed-battle.com/
>>> 
>>> SunSpider is another, although it is a little questionable about how impartial it is, at least it's not as biased as the others you pointed out and can be included in the data.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> - Hans
>> _______________________________________________
>> dba-Tech mailing list
>> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
>> Website:  http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dba-Tech mailing list
> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com



More information about the dba-Tech mailing list