Hans-Christian Andersen
hans.andersen at phulse.com
Sat Feb 2 19:03:31 CST 2013
Ah, got it. Thanks. Looks like the numbers are bit less conclusive. One thing for certain is that IE 10 is a vast improvement over IE 9. - Hans On 2013-02-02, at 2:57 PM, Salakhetdinov Shamil <mcp2004 at mail.ru> wrote: > + testings => http://www.speed-battle.com/ > > IE10, Win8 Prof 64bit > Calculate: 27.68 > Store: 461.52 > Render: 8.26 > Overall Score: 497.46 > > Chrome 24, Win8 Prof 64bit > Calculate: 75.85 > Store: 268.59 > Render: 5.6 > Overall Score: 350.04 -- Shamil > > > Воскресенье, 3 февраля 2013, 2:36 +04:00 от Salakhetdinov Shamil <mcp2004 at mail.ru>: >> Hi Hans -- >> >> I have just run http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/ . >> Here are the results: >> >> Chrome 24, VM Win7 Ultimate 32bit: => 2739 - HTML5 Capabilities 6/7 >> Chrome 24, VM Win7 64bit Prof: => 2858 - HTML5 Capabilities 5/7 >> Chrome 24, "bare metal" Win8 Prof 64bit: => 3152 - HTML5 Capabilities 6/7 >> http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/results?key=6ctT >> >> IE9, VM Win7 Ultimate 32bit: => 1139 - HTML5 Capabilities 3/7 >> IE9, VM Win7 64bit Prof: => 1220 - HTML5 Capabilities 3/7 >> IE10, "bare metal" Win8 Prof 64bit: => 1798 - HTML5 Capabilities 3/7 >> http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/results?key=6ctc&resultId=2963468 I haven't had IE10 for Win7 tests. >> >> As it happens Chrome outperforms IE10 and has almost complete HTML5 capabilities. >> >> Thank you. >> >> -- Shamil >> >> >> Суббота, 2 февраля 2013, 11:01 -08:00 от Hans-Christian Andersen < hans.andersen at phulse.com >: >>> >>>> I don't care that much how impartial the tests are - after all they made for Mozilla and I've tested IE and Chrome - may I assume the tests are impartial? I suppose I may.... >>>> >>>> And it doesn't matter for me that IE 10 runs better than Chrome 24 (or Safari) or not - AFAIS IE 10 is not bad at all for everyday tasks - am I missing something? >>> >>> It matters because many browsers are implemented differently, but they are all trying to work well enough with the same standard. If a test is designed to work best with your browser (and another one happens to work ok with, but not all of them), then you are testing a non-standard feature. The only thing that has been proven is that Internet Explorer 10 is more compatible with Mozilla Firefox, if you catch my drift. :) >>> >>>> Out of just sport interests I'd be curious to run really impartial Javascript tests on IE10 and compare them with Chrome and Safari - what such tests could be IYO? >>> >>> These days, performance is pretty decent across all browsers, so it really doesn't matter at all. The only ones who care are the companies/teams behind the browsers, so when searching for any decent javascript benchmarking sites, you will come across one from microsoft, one from mozilla, one from google, etc. >>> >>> If you want an impartial test, I might suggest this one: >>> http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/ >>> >>> Futuremark is a company which builds benchmarking software (originally for 3D graphics cards). I would trust them a lot more than I would trust a benchmark from any of the above companies. >>> >>> Another one is: http://www.speed-battle.com/ >>> >>> SunSpider is another, although it is a little questionable about how impartial it is, at least it's not as biased as the others you pointed out and can be included in the data. >>> >>> >>> - Hans >> _______________________________________________ >> dba-Tech mailing list >> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com >> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech >> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > _______________________________________________ > dba-Tech mailing list > dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com