Salakhetdinov Shamil
mcp2004 at mail.ru
Sun Feb 3 05:20:48 CST 2013
Yes, IE10 looks not bad. Still "HTML5 Capabilities 3/7" seems to be an issue? -- Shamil Суббота, 2 февраля 2013, 17:03 -08:00 от Hans-Christian Andersen <hans.andersen at phulse.com>: >Ah, got it. Thanks. Looks like the numbers are bit less conclusive. One thing for certain is that IE 10 is a vast improvement over IE 9. > >- Hans > > >On 2013-02-02, at 2:57 PM, Salakhetdinov Shamil < mcp2004 at mail.ru > wrote: > >> + testings => http://www.speed-battle.com/ >> >> IE10, Win8 Prof 64bit >> Calculate: 27.68 >> Store: 461.52 >> Render: 8.26 >> Overall Score: 497.46 >> >> Chrome 24, Win8 Prof 64bit >> Calculate: 75.85 >> Store: 268.59 >> Render: 5.6 >> Overall Score: 350.04 -- Shamil >> >> >> Воскресенье, 3 февраля 2013, 2:36 +04:00 от Salakhetdinov Shamil < mcp2004 at mail.ru >: >>> Hi Hans -- >>> >>> I have just run http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/ . >>> Here are the results: >>> >>> Chrome 24, VM Win7 Ultimate 32bit: => 2739 - HTML5 Capabilities 6/7 >>> Chrome 24, VM Win7 64bit Prof: => 2858 - HTML5 Capabilities 5/7 >>> Chrome 24, "bare metal" Win8 Prof 64bit: => 3152 - HTML5 Capabilities 6/7 >>> http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/results?key=6ctT >>> >>> IE9, VM Win7 Ultimate 32bit: => 1139 - HTML5 Capabilities 3/7 >>> IE9, VM Win7 64bit Prof: => 1220 - HTML5 Capabilities 3/7 >>> IE10, "bare metal" Win8 Prof 64bit: => 1798 - HTML5 Capabilities 3/7 >>> http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/results?key=6ctc&resultId=2963468 I haven't had IE10 for Win7 tests. >>> >>> As it happens Chrome outperforms IE10 and has almost complete HTML5 capabilities. >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> -- Shamil >>> <<< skipped >>> >