[dba-Tech] CQRS or 6*9 = 42

 Hi Lambert --

No, that math is correct but needs some clarifications - so it is just a teaser to get details from the referred articles.

Thank you.

-- Shamil


Четверг, 21 февраля 2013, 8:49 -05:00 от "Heenan, Lambert" <Lambert.Heenan at AIG.com>:
>"6*9 = 42" - so we have another HHGTG fan!
>
>Lambert :-)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:  dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Salakhetdinov Shamil
>Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 7:57 PM
>To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues
>Subject: [dba-Tech] CQRS or 6*9 = 42
>
> Hi All --
>
>I'm considering to try to apply CQRS + ES ( Command & Query Responsibility Segregation  and  Event Sourcing)  architectural patterns 
>
>http://www.udidahan.com/2009/12/09/clarified-cqrs/
>
>http://www.udidahan.com/2010/05/07/cqrs-isnt-the-answer-its-just-one-of-the-questions/
>
>in one of my test projects. I'm still to find good practical info on CQRS + ES drawbacks - do you have some?
>
>Thank you.
>
>-- Shamil
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>dba-Tech mailing list
>dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
>http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
>Website:  http://www.databaseadvisors.com