Jim Lawrence
accessd at shaw.ca
Sun May 12 14:25:11 CDT 2013
Hi Shamil and Gustav: Taking this discussion from the other side, one big question remains. Given that Linux was created with virtually no money and its various components are designed on very limited budgets, lots of volunteers, in some cases, working out of their basements, in their spare time, funded from donations or from tax incentives given out by other large companies which makes any money source, very tentative at best. It has not been until very recently that there is some stable money sources for Linux development. OTOH, given that Microsoft has a budget that is steady and in the billions. They can buy the very best developers, systems managers and sales staff (which in the case of Linux is non-existant). Therefore, comparing the two development environments it would be logical that Microsoft would be able to build a product superior in every way to Linux...but the opposite is true. On comparison, does this suggest that a corporate entity can not produce a good product? Not at all, think of Oracle. It's prices are expensive but they have designed some of the best databases in the market. They a fast reliable, secure, innovative and the products run on all the major platforms. Companies do not mind paying a good price for a product but they expect quality. Linux (and its related products) has set the bar and in twenty years Microsoft is now scrambling to keep up and the performance gap keeps getting wider. My question is, why is this so? That rant/posting, though questionable may have given some insight in to the core reasons. Does anyone have a better suggestion as to the causes and subsequent results? I am willing to listen to any suggestion as no one is more frustrated than I have been, in the last few years, with Microsoft. Jim -----Original Message----- From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Salakhetdinov Shamil Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2013 5:20 AM To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] The latest Debian Hi Gustav -- Yes, that article looks like a fake one or authored by a "psycho" with their superEGO bloated in the first part of the article and lost all their vapor in the second part. Taking such article into account doesn't look worthwhile from here... And all that conspirology, Kremlinoligy as they say, looks rather stupid. Linux is a good OS, no doubt, and it doesn't need such articles to be used to prove its "superiority" over MS Windows, IMO. Thank you. -- Shamil P.S. Typed on WinPhone from the garden house located in NW Russia - doing some groundwork here :) Воскресенье, 12 мая 2013, 10:30 +02:00 от "Gustav Brock" <gustav at cactus.dk>: > Hi Shamil > > I don't think so. Neither did Jim, so it seems, as that appended note is the > interesting part - written when the fellow had given the original blurb a > second thought. > > I don't get why some are so clever on behalf of Microsoft and its management > and are convinced, that MS is nothing but a bunch of idiots. In no > organisation anything is perfect, neither at MS, but when I think about it, > all the speakers and instructors I've met at MS developer events have been > people I would have a good time working with. More or less, of course, but I > don't believe they left all the bad guys back home at MS. > > /gustav >