Arthur Fuller
fuller.artful at gmail.com
Thu Feb 13 12:16:03 CST 2014
Given all the free apps available on various Linux flavours, as well as the user-friendly downloads of Ubuntu, Mint and others, and the costs of training the user-base to adapt to Linux vs. the costs of training said base to learn Windows 8, for me at least this is a no-brainer. I recommend to all my clients and friends who are open-minded, to switch to Linux and forget once and for all about costly updates to all the essential components that describe your environment. The various Linux installations have all pretty much achieved no-brainer status. LibreOffice can do anything Office can do. Linux in any variant has made it, and IMO has eclipsed Windows+Office. There's no longer a contest any more. The real question is "How can MS respond? And the available answers are: a) the Ostrich strategy: stick your head in the sand and hope for the best.Given the animosity MS has created in the world of Access developers, not to mention those in the Excel and Word 3P communities, I see no future in this avenue. b) Offer future versions of Windows and Office for free (two chances of that: a fat one and a slim one). Long story short, I see no future in betting on Microsoft, and I say this sadly, since for most of the past 20+ years I have made my income in betting on MS. But I no longer see that as a viable play. The more I examine the terrain, the more I feel that Ubuntu + Libre + various other packages comprise the most viable solution, for everything from Mom 'n' Pop to Large Scale Businesses. There is a cost-of-transition, no doubt about it. But compared with the MS licensing fees, this transition cost is trivial. An organization can adopt Linux, LibreOffice and MySQL for free and forever. Punch an accountant and ask her to wake up and smell her coffee, and further to test said implementation on any available disposable machine, or even a VM (which is also free, such as Oracle's VirtualBox). In short, there is no contest. All that remains is the will-power of the IT people in the given organization. Arthur