Gustav Brock
Gustav at cactus.dk
Sun Apr 26 16:15:36 CDT 2009
Hi all It is my impression that - in the mind of MS - a downgrade from SQL Server 200x (server-based) should be the SQL Server Compact Edition which is file-based as Access/JET is except that it is local and not shareable but is deployable via Click-Once. Next level below is pure XML. Using Access/JET - or MySQL or any other db - is simply another "business". /gustav >>> max.wanadoo at gmail.com 26-04-2009 19:26 >>> Arthur: Because... 1. I don't know how to do this. 2. I don't see any benefits other than more pain. 3. I don't see any DAO.Properties on the SQL tables. Inertia. Perhaps. Max -----Original Message----- From: dba-vb-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-vb-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Arthur Fuller Sent: 26 April 2009 15:39 To: Salakhetdinov Shamil; Discussion concerning Visual Basic and related programming issues. Subject: Re: [dba-VB] SCRUM: Northwind.NET v.1.1 (Alpha) with MS Access Backend published Shamil, It is not interesting to me, personally. All my database activity occurs in SQL Server and MySQL. The concept of an Access BE is for me so 20th century LOL. However, I realize that not everyone agrees and that some folks might like an Access BE. (Although given that SQL Express is free, I frankly don't understand this, other than the force of inertia.) Arthur