Shamil Salakhetdinov
shamil at smsconsulting.spb.ru
Thu Dec 3 05:29:49 CST 2009
Hi John -- OK. Don't break it with implementation of other approaches if it works... Just for the future projects - I suppose (I might be missing something as I do not have that experience but I plan to try, maybe within our Northwind.NET project) this partitioning stuff is just practical for the tasks as you do (similar stuff was available for non-relational DBMSs in the end of 70-es/beginning of 80ies, and for Oracle it's available for years now AFAIHH), and this stuff doesn't take that much time to learn (one day?) and use (a few short reusable T-SQL scripts?) that it would take to program and to test and to support dynamic T-SQ: for many SPs and UDFs... Thank you. -- Shamil -----Original Message----- From: dba-vb-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-vb-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 10:32 PM To: Discussion concerning Visual Basic and related programming issues. Subject: Re: [dba-VB] C# - Direct data manipulation Shamil, I have not. All of that is rather esoteric stuff for a non DBA. My job is processing data, and that is only a small part of my job, i.e. this is only one of many clients, and the only one that needs this kind of SQL Server stuff. As I have said many times, if my job was to go into a company every day and play DBA then I would learn many more things SQL Server related. As things stand I learn just enough to make things work, and a LITTLE extra in search of efficiency. It is certainly not that I don't want to, I just don't have the time. In the end I find the method I use comfortable from many angles. I have to do some things that require creating views, other "processing" tables and so forth. It really just works (for me) to do things this way, have separate databases to hold all of the "junk" associated with each list. Kind of the old "encapsulation" thing. Your suggestion would of course end up with all tables inside of a single "database", and as such the need for the Database parameter would go away but I still have to do the same thing to many different tables. Again, could this be done by one of the experts on the SQL Server list. Probably! Will I ever get there? Uhhhh doubtful. John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com <<< snip >>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4656 (20091202) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.esetnod32.ru