Shamil Salakhetdinov
shamil at smsconsulting.spb.ru
Sat Nov 14 08:44:11 CST 2009
Hi John, Yes, I have just "theoretically" noted that in the near future you'll be able to EVEN MORE EASILY work with sets of millions (and billions?) records by just loading them into memory, "crunching", and saving back updated... ... it will be just 1,2,3 instead of your today's (1,2,3) (1,2,3)... (1,2,3) (multi-threaded)... ... the time just to develop (1,2,3) (1,2,3)... (1,2,3)... will be more expensive than time to develop and run 1,2,3 on the near future hardware (hardware costs included)... -- Shamil -----Original Message----- From: dba-vb-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-vb-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 5:24 PM To: Discussion concerning Visual Basic and related programming issues. Subject: Re: [dba-VB] What to do, what to do? All of which is beside the point. Divide and conquer. A principal discovered by military strategists thousands of years ago, and applied to problems of all sorts today. I can EASILY work with sets of thousands, and even hundreds of thousands of records. In real life, in my computer. John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com <<< snip >>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4607 (20091114) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.esetnod32.ru