jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Sat Feb 21 22:31:54 CST 2009
LOL, I know. I was being facetious. I have said previously in this discussion that the space to cache my data so far has been trivial and of no consequence to me. It is important to try to understand what the requirements actually are however. At some point it might not be trivial and I would have to seriously consider the efficacy of doing so.. John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com Stuart McLachlan wrote: > It's not that bad. It's ony 300KB > > Take a look at your Processes in Task Manager. > Load an instance of Access and you load up about 9 - 10MB.. > Load an MDB and it goes up by about another MB > Just open one fairly simple form and you add about another 500KB > > Even if you only have 1GB of RAM, which is really the minimum requirement these days, > You are talking about a 3% increase in the RAM requirement. for the application and .03% > increase in overall RAM utilisation. >