[AccessD] Audit Trails

Hi Gustav,

My sense is that there are always optimal points with diminishing
returns thereafter. No, by schema I am referring to the concept that
'more is better' might more likely turn out to be 'more rope to hang' from.
-
Michael R Mattys
MapPoint and Database Dev
www.mattysconsulting.com
-
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gustav Brock" <Gustav at cactus.dk>
To: <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Audit Trails


Hi Michael

That is a valid concern. However, it isn't directly related to auditing if 
that is what you mean with "this schema".

There are many ways to prevent such total failures, like mirroring, raid 
systems, on-line local and/or remote backup, clustered servers, etc.

/gustav


>>> mmattys at rochester.rr.com 19-07-2009 16:06 >>>
I have a reservation about this schema.

I watched someone tear one of these drives apart trying to connect
to it some other way after it failed.

It brings to mind the addage, 'Don't put all your eggs in one basket.'
Or, at least, make sure you've cloned your eggs.

-
Michael R Mattys
MapPoint and Database Dev
www.mattysconsulting.com
-

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gustav Brock" <Gustav at cactus.dk>
To: <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Audit Trails


Hi Max

Exactly my point: 1.3 TB ~1000 * 1.3 GB databases (and how many GB sized dbs 
do you hold?).
Equals £0.11 or less than a US quarter or ?0.15 euro cents per database.
Hardly a topic for discussion.

/gustav


>>> max.wanadoo at gmail.com 19-07-2009 09:33 >>>
When you consider that last week I bought 1.5Tb HD for £110 sterling from PC
World. Plugs straight into my usb port and comes up as 1.3Tb formatted.

I can make copies to my hearts content and never run out of space.

Max


-- 
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com