[AccessD] [Spam]8.31 Re: 2 quick questions

jwcolby jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Fri May 27 11:36:05 CDT 2011


Uhhhh Ohhhhh...

;)

John W. Colby
www.ColbyConsulting.com

On 5/27/2011 12:09 PM, Arthur Fuller wrote:
> With all due respect, I suggest that you read some Codd and Date on this
> topic.As for the complexities involved in use of IKs, it is brain-dead easy.
>
>
> But that said, I am not a big fan of IKs. Like most of us on this forum, I
> tend to favour AutoNumber out of force of habit rather than rational
> analysis. I have read numerous things by Joe Celko and Chis Date which
> refute the use of AutoNumber|Idnentity Keys, and I accept them halfway. I
> don't give a fork from which a given tire was hatched, unless and until
> several of these instances have caused highway fatalities. Therefore, I need
> build this (batch) into the design, so that I can report to all owners of
> said tires a warning that there are potential issues.
>
> This is going to be extremely problematic to solve with the AutoNumber
> scenario. An intelligent key could make the query dramatically simpler.
>
> That's all I'm saying. I typically use AutoNumbers in almost every app I
> write, but the more crucial and life-threatening the app, the more likely I
> shall use IKs.
>
> A.



More information about the AccessD mailing list