Salakhetdinov Shamil
mcp2004 at mail.ru
Tue Mar 4 14:05:52 CST 2014
> I have to tell you that it was a scary moment... "Luddite moment"? ;) You could have just used to use [WindowKey] + [D] to get switched into Win8.x desktop mode... -- Shamil Tuesday, March 4, 2014 2:20 PM -05:00 from John W Colby <jwcolby at gmail.com>: >>OK, I learned a lot from that vid and I'm convinced - for me W8 is totally useless. None of my >gestures have any effect on my machines. > >"Flipping off" a machine definitely does not work! ;) OTOH a hammer seems to work. > > >With some effort and learning curve I can enjoy all the advantages of W7. > >Well... in a word ... NO. > >Windows 8 did away with Windows. We expect that the next version of the operating system will be >called Panes 9. Or to the curmudgeonly masses, PAINS 9. ;) > >Panes of course are lobotomized windows. They MUST run the full height of the display. They have >no controls related to minimizing, or adjusting the vertical size. In 8.0 they snapped to a fixed >(by MS?) size if you tried to have more than one. > >So with Windows (Panes) 8, you were allowed TWO panes. The horizontal sizes appeared to be fixed, >i.e. yes you could have them, but they would be THIS EXACT WIDTH. Which led to a tall narrow pane >and whatever was left of the screen. Why this is a good idea I will leave to the Fanbois to explain. > >With Windows (Panes) 8.1, they loosened up a bit and allowed more panes. Home many more you ask? >Well... what is the resolution of your monitor? It seems that the number of horizontal pixels >determines the number you can have. I will let a fanboi jump into this to explain how it works, >since I decided if I can't have Windows I am outa here. But from what I remember, the higher the >(horizontal) resolution the larger the number of (full height) panes you could have. Why any of >this is superior to actual Windows (on a desktop) I will leave to the Windows 8 Fanbois to explain. >I assume it has to do with making your dual monitor desktop look and act like a windows phone. >Hmmmmm..... (this wasn't MY idea!!!) > >Understand that I left the Windows (Panes / Pains) 8 scene about 30 minutes after downloading 8.1 >and discovered that it seemed to suck as bad as the 8.0 version. > >I have to tell you that it was a scary moment taking my 1000 dollar brand new laptop and doing a >Windows 7 install on it. HP had told me essentially that they did not support Windows 7 on my new >laptop, and that I was on my own. After the install it took probably a day of researching chipset >drivers and downloading them to get all of the objects under device manager functioning. But it >worked. I even have touch enabled. I then swapped out the shitty 5400 RPM notebook disk with a >Samsung EVO 500gb drive and Wowza!!! A quad core Intel I7 laptop with 8 gigs RAM, a moderately >powerful video, and SSD running Windows 7. > >YES!!! > >Back to my mud hole, where I get actual work done. > >John W. Colby > >Reality is what refuses to go away >when you do not believe in it ><<< skipped >>>