Gustav Brock
gustav at cactus.dk
Wed Feb 6 07:23:13 CST 2013
Hi Stuart and Peter That is not fully correct. With Visual Studio and the Entity Framework you can, in fact, code (write?) your classes and methods and - when finished - it will create a database schema that fits. I have only played with it, but it is fun and quite amazing what it can do. If you make changes, the framework adjusts the schema to fit. That said, I cannot imagine how you can test anything without having the database. Read about Code First here: http://visualstudiomagazine.com/articles/2011/05/01/pfint_ef-code-first.aspx /gustav -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] På vegne af Peter Brawley Sendt: 5. februar 2013 23:45 Til: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues Emne: Re: [dba-Tech] Depend on me, and Ill set you free! On 2013-02-05 3:21 PM, Stuart McLachlan wrote: > Does he have it right? > > What does he mean by "written". Is that "documented" or "coded"? I assumed documented and they survived analytic walkthrough, 'cuz 'coded' would make no sense without a data backend. PB ----- > > He says "use cases and business rules written and tested" To test, you need code. > That means he is defining "written" as "coded", not "documented".. > > Use cases and business rules documented? Yes - that's a fundamental part of systems > design. > > Coded and tested? No way before you have the data model!