Gustav Brock
gustav at cactus.dk
Fri Mar 8 04:34:14 CST 2013
Hi Jim It appears that you are - ahem - not fully updated on this ... 1. Check Windows Server 2012 for servers Windows 8 for desktops and laptops and Intel pads Windows 8 RT for non-Intel pads Windows Phone 8 for smart phones 2. Check Nearly everything MS is doing these days is related to the cloud and all products evolve with a focus on the cloud. Azure Office 365 Skydrive Skype Office 2013 operates directly on files in the cloud Windows Phone Office ditto Windows 8 installs (if you wish) at once with a Live account to Skydrive Visual Studio lets you deploy to the cloud (Azure) "just like that" 3. Bad idea Why should they? If you are open-minded and don't have specific preferences, MS can service any computer/phone user. 4. Well ... This will always be a balance between competition and cooperation Office for Mac 2011 exists Office 365 is (planned) available for several platforms Hyper-V Server will host VMs with any OS running on Intel Skydrive is (planned) available for several platforms Skype is available for most platforms 5. Check That strategy is cooperation and common design. The Metro interface will run on anything from phones and dedicated appliances to TV sets and intelligent white-boards Information (files, messages, etc.) will be shareable between all platforms. 6. I don't quite understand what you mean here and I have zero experience with Oracle. However, Visual Studio is a superior product and, for that reason, has a huge and loyal user base. 7. Check Ignoring for a moment that MS is number one in several areas, MS do listen. As a registered Microsoft partner taking advantage of the MAPS, we once a year receive an extensive questionnaire about all parts of our relations with MS. Later the result of this is partly commented and, from this and later, I can see that they (our local Microsoft corporation) really try to improve. The major point where nothing improves is licensing but that's another story. Whenever I've attended a Microsoft meeting for developers, the attitude has been very much to receive feedback - I've just never met a "we alone know" kind of attitude. /gustav -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] På vegne af Jim Lawrence Sendt: 7. marts 2013 19:57 Til: 'Discussion of Hardware and Software issues' Emne: Re: [dba-Tech] Beating a dead horse? Microsoft is much too big of player to be counted out. They are going to have to take a back seat for a while and remake themselves much like the unstoppable IBM has done. I think they should consider few options. 1. Maybe they should separate OS versions into various types. depending on what type of platform and hardware. 2. Maybe concentrate on specific environments like the Cloud. 3. Realize that they can not be all things to all people all at the same time. 4. Allow third-party OSs and products to integrate better. Change the attitude that all their competition must lose for them to succeed. 5. Have long-term strategies for specific products rather than build and dump products on a whim. 6. Work closer with the people that develop their products. Outside developers built their company and those same developers can dump their company if they are not being treated right. Look no further than Oracle for a good example of building Tech loyalty. 7. Lose the attitude that they are number one and deserve to be so. Start listening more to their supporters or they wouldn't have many. Picking any option from this list and following through on it will help in Microsoft's recovery. Jim